“Identity trauma”. This is the title under which the day of the department of psychoanalysis of Paris 8 was held on January 9th. This theme propos by Clotilde Leguil invites us to cross two concepts. One of which is certainly psychoanalytic – trauma – while the other is more vague. Identity has been so fashionable in the social sciences that one could have thought it was worn to the bone, but it is indestructible. These two signifiers, identity trauma, therefore have this in common that they both master signifiers of our time. The attacks, since that of 1995, in France. By their impact. Have l to a response from the State: from the recognition of the victims to the establishment of emergency cells intend to c for them. Didier Cremniter. Who heads one of these units (the CUMP) was present was able to report on the specific emergency clinic in which he works.
The proliferation of disasters
disruptive events that traumatize civilians strike at rom, have had the power to consolidate a specific identity: that of the victim. If Richard Rechtman indicates the absolute necessity of recognizing this status the appeasement that it provides. Guy Briole was able to highlight. From clinical examples of great phone number list finesse, how this borrow. “Artificial” identity could also be, in a second phase, a source of confusion for the subject. The latter, in the course of the analysis, will thus be able to which fund to entrust your funds take the path in the opposite direction that will lead him from these signifiers of the time, of a moment, to his own signifiers . From there, to his “most assur identity”: his symptom, to use Jacques-Alain Miller’s proposal [1] . As Clotilde Leguil recall in her introductory text [2] , if there is an identity that is valid in psychoanalysis, it is that of the I. An I to which the symptom gives its tone, its style like no other. It is therefore in opposition to the dominant discourse that favors these
This discourse of the master so eager
– the T1 box / “You one”, as Marie-Hélène Brousse illustrat last year in her seminar at the ECF [3] , with this ambiguity taken from a cure . Thus proposes a multiplicity of identities. which . Ultimately, only “paper”, Marie-Hélène Brousse emphasizes again. Paper to throw away. But paper that sticks to the skin, that clean email separates segregates, as Eric Laurent show by deploying the logic of the recent American elections, the promotion of the ideal of whiteness , revisit by Donald Trump. He duces that the politics of identities. Defend by Hilary Clinton, has “encounter a trauma”, to the benefit therefore of a return of identity as One. Concomitantly, a politics of “the unprictable chaos” emerges, with “authorization for a bad enjoyment”.